RM

Responsibility Meter

Current-event accountability

DashboardNew
otherSports Governance Title ReversalGeneva, Switzerland and Rabat, Moroccostable 83.0

CAF overturns Senegal's AFCON title and awards championship to Morocco

CAF's appeals board overturned Senegal's Africa Cup of Nations final victory and declared Morocco the champion by forfeit after the chaotic January final in Rabat. The ruling turned on questions of procedural authority, tournament integrity, and whether a walk-off protest could erase the match result after the fact.

curated-2026third-waveafconcafsenegalmoroccosports-governanceappeals-ruling

Published

3/17/2026

Current public event date

Source base

2 sources

Evidence records attached to this event

Actor field

3 ranked

2 primary / 1 structural

Incident links

1

Analyses connected to this incident

Editorial note

Curated as a governance and adjudication event rather than a simple sports result.

Event harm

48.8

Overall event-level harm score

Top culpability

37.6

CAF appeals board

Confidence

83.0

How stable the current public reading is

Top responsibility

77.0

Highest primary responsibility before event harm is applied

Challenge the reading

Reassess the event harm from new evidence

Paste a fresh article, copied source text, or a correction note and compare a new harm estimate against the current public score before saving a pending revision.

Current harm

48.8

The live event-harm score on this post

Current confidence

83.0

How stable the current public reading is

Source base

2

Public sources currently attached to this event

Event harm

Harm context

The public harm score is grounded in who bears the harm, what protections are in play, and the broader social fallout.

Who is harmed

Senegal's players and supporters, and the wider public that depends on credible and transparent tournament governance.

Rights or laws at risk

Procedural fairness, appeal transparency, and confidence that governing bodies will apply competition rules consistently.

Societal impact

The reversal damaged trust in continental sports governance and raised questions about who ultimately controls high-stakes competition outcomes.

Overview

Highest ranked primary actor

Start with the strongest direct attribution before moving into the wider field and structural enablers.

CAF appeals board

Rank #1 with the highest weighted culpability in the current public reading.

Culpability

37.6

Weighted contribution

Confidence

91.0

Attribution stability

Rank #1InterpreterinstitutionConfederation of African Football

CAF appeals board

Ranked in the public field as a interpreter with a current responsibility band of meaningful.

stable 91.0

Responsibility

77.0

Actor-level role score before event harm is applied.

Culpability

37.6

Final contribution after event harm weighting.

Confidence

91.0

Current stability of the attribution.

Evidence links

1

Attached source links for this actor.

Why this actor is ranked here

The appeals board made the decisive interpretive move that reversed the title result, so it carries the clearest responsibility for the governance outcome itself.

1 evidence link

Chart views

Score breakdown

Switch between ranked culpability, top-actor dimension mix, contribution balance, and revision timeline.

Ranked actors

3

Actors represented in the ladder and contribution views.

Top actor

CAF appeals board

Highest-ranked primary actor in the current public reading.

Revisions

13

Live revisions contributing to the timeline chart.

Active chart

Ladder

Current visualization mode.

Ranked field

Other primary actors

These actors sit in the direct chain of authorship, authorization, interpretation, planning, or execution.

Rank #2ExecutorinstitutionSenegal

Senegal final delegation

Ranked in the public field as a executor with a current responsibility band of peripheral.

stable 83.0

Responsibility

50.2

Actor-level role score before event harm is applied.

Culpability

24.5

Final contribution after event harm weighting.

Confidence

83.0

Current stability of the attribution.

Evidence links

1

Attached source links for this actor.

Why this actor is ranked here

The walk-off protest by Senegal's delegation was not the final legal decision, but it was a central factual trigger that the appeals board used to justify the forfeiture ruling.

1 evidence link

Structural layer

Systemic enablers

These actors do not sit at the direct command or execution layer, but they materially fund, normalize, or otherwise enable the event chain.

Rank #3BeneficiaryinstitutionSystemic enablerMorocco

Moroccan football federation

Shown in the structural layer as a beneficiary with a current responsibility band of negligible.

supported 75.0

Responsibility

20.8

Actor-level role score before event harm is applied.

Culpability

10.2

Final contribution after event harm weighting.

Confidence

75.0

Current stability of the attribution.

Evidence links

1

Attached source links for this actor.

Why this actor is ranked here

Morocco was the direct institutional beneficiary of the title reversal, but the reporting does not place primary decision-making responsibility on its federation.

1 evidence link